Recreated template · Risk interpretation

Signal Validation & Action Log

Separate an observation from a diagnosis, then turn the investigation into a next action.

Download PDFDownload Word

PDF for printing. Word for editing. Prefer plain text? Download Markdown (.md).

Free to adapt. Newly created for Ruff Justice, not a former-employer document. The example below is fictional.

When to use it

Use before escalating a health-score change or treating an activity metric as evidence of value.

Work the questions in order

  1. Record exactly what changed and how the signal was generated.
  2. Write down at least one alternative explanation and seek corroborating customer context.
  3. Choose the next useful action, assign an owner, and record what would change your assessment.

Your working notes

Use these prompts in your own document, or print this page and write in the spaces.

Observed signal

What changed? Include the source, date, and measurement window.

How it is produced

Whose actions count? Could automation, internal access, missing data, or a changed definition affect it?

Initial hypothesis

What might it mean for the customer? Keep this separate from fact.

Alternative explanation

What else could produce the same signal?

Corroborating evidence

What does the customer say? What other evidence agrees or conflicts?

Assessment and uncertainty

What do you currently believe, and what is still unknown?

Action, owner, review

What happens next, who owns it, and when will the assessment be revisited?

See a fictional worked example

Fictional example: customer logins decline, but an automated report still supports a weekly planning meeting. Confirm that the intended recipients receive and use the report before deciding whether the account is disengaged.