Recreated template · Capacity and adoption

Purchase-to-Value Scope Check

Distinguish unused entitlement from a solvable adoption gap or a changed business plan.

Download PDFDownload Word

PDF for printing. Word for editing. Prefer plain text? Download Markdown (.md).

Free to adapt. Newly created for Ruff Justice, not a former-employer document. The example below is fictional.

When to use it

Use when usage is below the purchased scope or when a planned rollout stalls.

Work the questions in order

  1. Compare original purchase assumptions with the customer’s current needs.
  2. Separate active value, delayed scope, and scope that is no longer relevant.
  3. Agree on an adoption action or a commercial conversation based on the actual gap.

Your working notes

Use these prompts in your own document, or print this page and write in the spaces.

Original intent

What outcome, team, or deployment was the purchase intended to support?

Current use and value

Who uses the product now, and what do they get from it?

Unrealized scope

What has not been deployed or adopted?

Reason for the gap

Is this a learning need, technical dependency, timing issue, funding decision, or changed priority?

Customer-confirmed next step

What action is relevant now? Who on the customer side owns it?

Commercial coordination

Does the scope need review with the authorized commercial owner?

Review evidence

What observation would tell both sides the plan is working?

See a fictional worked example

Fictional example: one business unit is using the product, but a second rollout was postponed. The team confirms whether that second rollout is still funded before assigning a generic adoption campaign.