Recreated template · Changing priorities

Engagement Drift Check

Investigate quieter engagement without assuming that silence means dissatisfaction.

Download PDFDownload Word

PDF for printing. Word for editing. Prefer plain text? Download Markdown (.md).

Free to adapt. Newly created for Ruff Justice, not a former-employer document. The example below is fictional.

When to use it

Use when meetings, workflow usage, or stakeholder participation change without a clear explanation.

Work the questions in order

  1. Compare the observation with the customer’s usual pattern and check measurement quality.
  2. Ask what changed in the customer’s priorities, team, or workflow.
  3. Confirm a relevant outcome and a small next step, or acknowledge that the old use case no longer fits.

Your working notes

Use these prompts in your own document, or print this page and write in the spaces.

Change observed

What is different from the account’s normal pattern?

Benign explanations

Could seasonality, automation, staff changes, or incomplete tracking explain it?

Customer perspective

What does the customer say changed? When did you last confirm their priorities?

Current outcome

Is the existing success-plan outcome still relevant? What has replaced it?

Next useful step

What would the customer actually want to try or resolve?

Owner and evidence

Who will act, and what will show whether it helped?

Review decision

When will you continue, revise, or stop the proposed approach?

See a fictional worked example

Fictional example: a project ends and product activity declines. The CSM checks whether a new priority needs the product rather than treating the completed project as a failed adoption effort.